SPOKEN INTO THE VOID:
COLLECTED ESSAYS 1897 - 1900

Adolf Loos

Adolf Loos: SPOKEN INTO THE VOID: COLLECTED ESSAYS 1897 -1900. [Oppositions Books]. Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press and The Institute For Architecture And Urban Studies, 1982. First edition. Quarto. Orange cloth stamped in black. Printed dust jacket. Black endpapers. 146 pp. Black and white illustrations. Dust jacket spine sunned. Upper corner gently bumped. Book design by Massimo Vignelli. A nearly fine copy.

8.75 x 10 book with 146 pages and well illustrated with black and white photographs, drawings and plans. Introduction by Aldo Rossi. Translation by Jane Newman and John Smith.

Adolf Loos [1870-1933] ranks as one of the most important pioneers of the modern movement in architecture. Ironically, his influence was based largely on a few interior designs and a body of controversial essays. Adolf Loos 's buildings were rigorous examples of austere beauty, ranging from conventional country cottages to planar compositions for storefronts and residences. His built compositions were little known outside his native Austria during his early years of practice.

In 1897, in the pages of The Neue Freie Presse of Vienna, Loos began a series of polemic articles that later established his international reputation. He did not directly address architecture in his writings; instead he examined a wide range of social ills, identified as the motivating factors behind the struggle for a transformation of everyday life.

Adolf Loos 's writings focused increasingly on what he regarded as the excess of decoration in both traditional Viennese design and in the more recent products of the Vienna Secession and the Wiener Werkstatte. In 1898, in the pages of the review Ver Sacrum, which was an organ of the Wiener Secession, Loos published an essay that marked the beginning of a long theoretical opposition to the then popular art noveau movement. His theories culminated in a short essay entitled, "Ornament And Crime," published in 1908, where he posited the lack of ornament in architecture was a sign of spiritual strength. Adolf Loos referred to the opposite, excessive ornamentation, as criminal - not for abstract moral reasons, but because of the economics of labor and wasted materials in modern industrial civilization. Adolf Loos argued that because ornament was no longer an important manifestation of culture, the worker dedicated to its production could not be paid a fair price for his labor. The essay rapidly became a theoretical manifesto and a key document in modernist literature and was widely circulated abroad. Le Corbusier later attributed "an Homeric cleansing" of architecture to the work.

Another point of contention decried by Adolf Loos was the masking of the true nature and beauty of materials by useless and indecent ornament. In his 1898 essay entitled "Principles of Building," Adolf Loos wrote that the true vocabulary of architecture lies in the materials themselves, and that a building should remain "dumb" on the outside.

In his own work, Adolf Loos contrasted austere facades with lavish interiors. Much like Mies van der Rohe, Adolf Loos arrived at the reduction of architecture to a purely technical tautology that emphasized the simple assemblage of materials. This article was followed by the 1910 essay entitled "Architecture," in which Adolf Loos explained important contradictions in design: between the interior and the exterior, the monument and the house, and art works and objects of function. To Adolf Loos, the house did not belong to art because the house must please everyone, unlike a work of art, which does not need to please anyone. The only exception, that is, the only constructions that belong both to art and architecture, were the monument and the tombstone. Adolf Loos felt that the rest of architecture, which by necessity must serve a specific end, must be excluded from the realm of art.

The Institute For Architecture And Urban Studies was founded in 1967 as a non-profit independent agency concerned with research, education, and development in architecture and urbanism. It began as a core group of young architects seeking alternatives to traditional forms of education and practice. Peter Eisenman was appointed as the Institutes first executive director followed by Anthony Vidler (1982), Mario Gandelsonas (1983) and Stephen Petersen (1984). In 1985 the Institute ceased to exist.

Spreads from this volume can be viewed here.

out of stock